Gamma-Rays and Neutrinos from Dark Matter

1

Gamma-Rays and Neutrinos from Dark Matter

F. W. Stecker^

^Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, U.S.A.

High energy astrophysical 7-rays and neutrinos can be produced both by the annihilation and possible slow
decay of dark matter particles. We discuss the fluxes and spectra of such secondaries produced by dark matter
particles in the universe and their observability in competition with other astrophysical 7-ray signals and with
atmospheric neutrinos. To do this, we work within the assumption that the dark matter particles are neutralinos
with are the lightest supersymmetric particles (LSPs) predicted by supersymmetry theories.

1. THE NATURE OF THE DARK
MATTER

The nature of the dark matter is the subject of
a number of papers in these proceedings. For our
purposes here, it is sufficient to sumarize some
relevant points, i.e., with densities expressed as a
fraction of the closure density of the universe, SI,
the fraction in baryons, SI5 derived from big bang
nucleosynthesis arguments, is much less than the
total gravitating value of SI required by studies
of the large scale structure of the universe and
by observed large scale dynamics of the universe.
This would imply that the bulk of the dark matter
in the universe is non-baryonic.

The mixed dark matter model with a total

= 1 [1] predicted fluctuations in the cosmic
background radiation [2,3] which were found to be
in good agreement with the later COBE measure-
ments. The best agreement appears to be found
for ~ 20% hot dark matter, of which massive neu-
trinos are the most likely candidates, and ~ 80%
cold dark matter [4-8]. The hot dark matter may
consist of 2 or 3 neutrino flavors with degener-
ate masses [1,9,10]. The most popular cold dark
matter particle candidates, as discussed elsewhere
in these proceedings, are axions and neutralinos.
Of these, the neutralinos, the LSPs from super-
symmetry (SUSY) theory, produce high-energy 7-
rays and neutrinos as well as other particles such
as the antiprotons [11-14], and positrons [13,15]
discussed elsewhere in these proceedings.

Neutralinos can produce 7-rays and neutri-

nos in two possible ways. The most guaran-
teed way is by mutual pair annihilations, which
can take place because the neutralinos are Majo-
rana fermions. Indeed, it is the bulk of this self-
destruction, which occurs in the very early uni-
verse, which determines the value for Q,^ (we will
hereafter designate the dark matter neutralinos
by the letter x). The second way in which dark
matter can produce 7-rays and neutrinos is if the
LSP is allowed to decay to non-supersymmetric,
ordinary particles.

Cosmologically important x particles must an-
nihilate with a weak cross section, {(tv)a ~ 10~^®
cm^s""'^; calculations show that such cross sec-
tions lead to a value for Q,^ ~ 1 with Q,^cc{(tv)^ .
The fact that SUSY neutralinos are predicted to
have such weak annihilation cross sections is one
reason why they have become popular dark mat-
ter candidates {e.g. [16]).

In the minimal SUSY model (MSSM), x can
be generally described as a superposition of two
gaugino states and two Higgsino states. Grand
unified models with a universal gaugino mass gen-
erally favor states where x is almost a pure B-ino
(5) {e.g. [17]), but other states such as photinos
and Higgsinos are generally allowed by the theory.
Indeed, Kane (these proceedings) presents possi-
ble accelerator evidence from CDF that x may be
a Higgsino of mass ~ 40 GeV. Theoretical mod-
els for particle dark matter are discussed in detail
elsewhere in these proceedings.

2

2. ANNIHILATION TO GAM MA- RAYS

There are basically two types of spectra pro-
duced by XX annihilations, viz., (1) 7-ray contin-
uum spectra from the decay of secondary parti-
cles produced in the annihilation process, and (2)
7-ray lines, produced primarily from the process
XX 11-

2.1. Continuum Gamma-Rays

The continuum 7-ray production spectrum
from XX annihilation can be calculated for dif-
ferent types of neutralinos using the appropri-
ate branching ratios for annihilation into fermion-
antifermion pairs {e.g., for photinos (7) B.R.
cx iSfin'jQ^ and for Higgsinos (h) B.R. cx l3fm'j).

The continuum spectra are generally the result
of hadronic cascades leading to the production
and decay of neutral pions [13,18,19]; however,
the radiative decay B* — B7 can play a role in
hardening the spectrum if the dark matter par-
ticles are Higgsinos [19]. One can employ a pro-
gram such as the Lund Monte Carlo program [20]
to follow the quark jet cascades and subsequent
particle decays in order to obtain a final 7-ray
production spectrum [19].

The cosmic 7-ray fiux from XX annihilation is
proportional to the line-of-sight integral of the
square of the x particle density times {(7v)a,

4>{E^) ~ 1.8 X lQ-%ts)pl3M-\av)^e

xC^f(E.^)cm-'-'s-hr-^ (1)

where {£§) is the mean line-of-sight integration
length through the dark matter galactic halo in
units of 8 kpc, po^s is the mass density of the
dark matter halo (obtained from galactic rota-
tion curves) in units of 0.3 GeV cm~^,{av)26 is in
units of 10~^® cm^s""'^, C is the 7-ray multiplicity
per annihilation and f{E^f) is the normalized en-
ergy distribution function of the 7-rays produced.
As can be seen from eq. (1), cosmic 7-ray fiuxes
from XX annihilations are proportional to the an-
nihilation cross section at low energy, which is re-
lated to the high temperature annihilation cross
section (see, e.g., [16]) and is roughly inversely
proportional to Sl^.

Stecker and Tylka [19] discuss in detail the var-
ious channels involved in 7-ray production via
XX annihilation and give the resulting spectra for
some lower mass x particles. One can general-
ize from these results to conclude that the 7-rays
from a dark matter halo will probably be unob-
servable near the galactic plane because of the
competing continuum 7-rays produced by galac-
tic cosmic rays interacting with interstellar gas.
Those processes produce much higher fiuxes, ex-
cept perhaps at very high energies if the x particle
is massive enough.

At high galactic latitudes, the situation is
somewhat different, but still unpromising. Here,
in addition to the 7-ray fiux produced by cosmic
rays in a line-of-sight perpendicular to the galac-
tic disk, there is an extragalactic background fiux
which is at least as intense as the galactic one at
~ 0.1 GeV, and which is expected to dominate
over the galactic fiux at multi-GeV energies. The
extragalactic 7-ray background fiux, as recently
estimated [21], is expected to be more substantial
in the multi-GeV range than previously thought.
This background is expected to be from the jets of
unresolved blazars, a type of active galaxy whose
relativistically beamed emission is rapidly vari-
able and usually highly polarized. Blazars are the
only known source of extragalactic high energy
7-rays [22]. At least two of these objects, Mrk
421 and Mrk 501, are known to be sources with
hard spectra extending to energies above a TeV
[23,24]. The latest estimates of the high energy
extragalactic 7-ray background from unresolved
blazars (see Figure 1) [21,25], predict fiuxes, even
in the range between 10 GeV and 1 TeV, which
are much larger than the continuum fiuxes pre-
dicted for XX annihilation. This dims the hope of
observing continuum x annihilation 7-rays from
a dark matter halo at high galactic latitudes.

A more promising possibility would be to look
for a very hard spectrum of xX annihilation 7-
rays from a compact dark matter core which
might exist at the galactic center [27]. Such a
signal would resemble a point source with a 7-ray
detector of angular resolution close to 1° [19]. In
fact, a strong source, 2EG J1746-2852, has been
observed at the galactic center [22]. This source is
observed to have a very hard spectrum extending

3

Figure 1. The predicted flux of extragalac-
tic background 7-rays from unresolved blazars
[21,25]. The preliminary data obtained by the
EGRET detector on the Compton Gamma Ray
Observatory satellite [26] are also shown.

to energies of at least 10 GeV (J. Mattox, pri-
vate communication). Such a spectrum would be
consistent with the hypothesis that the source of
the emission is annihilation radiation from a dark
matter core [19].

2.2. Gamma-Ray Lines

There is also the possibility of observing the
two-photon annihilation line from XX annihila-
tion [28] with a 7-ray detector of sufficient energy
resolution. The general considerations for observ-
ability of this line were discussed in detail in Ref.
[29].

The energy of the xX ~^ 11 decay line is =
M^. The line width is given by Doppler broad-
ening. For galactic halo particles, this width
is roughly P^M^ ~ IQ'^M^. The line flux,
(f){M-^) cx , as discussed in the previous sec-
tion.

Therefore, upper and lower limits on SI yield
lower and upper limits on the 7-ray line flux re-
spectively. Other limits can also be obtained in
flux-energy space [29]. Accelerator determined
lower limits on give lower limits on the line
energy. Lower limits on the mass of the sfermion
exchanged in the annihilation process give up-
per limits on {(tv)a since {(tv)a oc ^J"^- In
fact, since the particle density = p^/M^ and
{av)A oc M^/M^, it follows from eq. (1) that

ij>{E^) (X MJ^. Further limits are obtained from
the inequality > M^, which is the tautology
following from the condition that x be the LSP.

If we assume that annihilations occur mainly
through slepton exchange, i.e., Mq ^ Mj-, we can
obtain an upper limit on the 27 line flux. This is
because LEP 1.5 gives a lower limit of ~ 65 GeV
on the slepton mass, whereas the substantially
higher squark mass lower limit of ~ 150 GeV
would imply much lower fluxes, since (f)^ cx Mj"^ .

Using the latest estimates of the high energy
extragalactic 7-ray background from unresolved
blazars [21,25] (see Figure 1), and the latest lower
limits on the sfermion masses, one flnds that even
with a 10% energy resolution, the x annihilation
line from dark matter in the galactic halo will be
difficult to observe above the extragalactic back-
ground. However, as in the continuum case dis-
cussed in the previous section, it may be possible
to observe a 27 line from a compact isothermal
core [27] at the galactic center with ~10% energy
resolution, an angular resolution of ~ 1°, and an
exposure of 1 m^sr-yr (see discussion in previous
section).

3. ANNIHILATION TO NEUTRINOS

Neutrinos from xX annihilation will be pro-
duced in galactic and extragalactic space with
energies and fluxes similar to the fluxes of the 7-
rays produced. This being the case, and given the
much smaller cross sections for neutrino interac-
tions than for 7-ray interactions, one might pre-
sume that one would require an incredibly large
neutrino detector, perhaps built on the moon to
get above the neutrinos produced by cosmic rays
in the Earth's atmosphere, to detect dark mat-

4

ter neutrinos. However, the small neutrino cross
section, and the resulting transparency of matter
to neutrinos, can also work in favor of dark mat-
ter neutrino detection. The Sun can attract and
gravitationally focus galactic x particles, where
they can be scattered by solar protons and cap-
tured. They then lose energy by further colli-
sions, eventually finding themselves concentrated
in the Sun's core where their annihilation rate is
enhanced [30]. The x density in the solar core
builds up to the point where the XX annihila-
tion rate reaches equilibrium with the solar x
capture rate [31]. Whereas the other x annih-
lation products will not escape from the Sun's
core, the neutrinos will, providing a potentially
detectable point-source signal with a characteris-
tic spectrum e.g. [32]. The neutrinos from xX
annihilations will have typical energies of at least
several GeV, perhaps tens of GeV. They are thus
easily distinguishable from other solar neutrinos
and in the energy range for neutrino telescopes
presently planned or under construction.

Figure 2. Relative event rates for 15 GeV so-
lar X particle annihilaton neutrinos (solid line)
and atmospheric cosmic-ray produced neutrinos
(dashed line). The x neutrino spectrum was com-
puted using the Lund Monte Carlo program as in
[14,19].

Since the solar xX annihilation rate equals the
capture rate, resulting in a few high energy neu-
trinos per annihilation, and since the distance to
the Sun is well known, it is easy to make rough es-
timates of the solar xX annihilation neutrino fiux.
This fiux should be detectable with a neutrino
telescope of suitable detecting area (see, e.g., [33].
The detection event rate r[E) cx E^(j>{E), where
(/)(£") is the neutrino fiux. This is because the
(Tj^AT cx E and the range of the detected muon
produced by the i>N interaction is also linear in
energy. Thus, detectability is skewed to higher
energies by a factor of .

Figure 2 shows the relative event rate for
cosmic-ray produced atmospheric i^'s and solar
i^'s from XX annihilation calculated for M-^ = 15
GeV. Because of the steepness of the atmospheric
i> spectrum, it should be possible to observe i^'s
from annihilations of higher mass x particles as
well.

4. DARK MATTER DECAY

SUSY theories involve a multiplicative quan-
tum number called R-panty, which is defined so
that it is even for ordinary particles and odd for
their SUSY partners. Thus, if R-parity is con-
served, as is usually assumed, the LSP is com-
pletely stable, making it a potential dark matter
candidate. However, such may not be the case.
R-parity may be very weakly broken, allowing the
LSP to decay with branching ratios involving 7-
rays and neutrinos {e.g. [34]). For x particles to
be the dark matter, their decay time should be
considerably longer than the age of the universe.
Of course, invocation of x decay involves a higher
order of speculation and SUSY model building.

The possible radiative decay X ^ will give
a 7-ray line with energy E"^ = M^j'l. Such a line
has the potential of being more intense than the
annihilation line. Whereas the xX annihilation
rate and consequent line fiux is cosmologically
limited by requiring Sl^ to be a significant frac-
tion near 1 (see previous discussion), the decay
line fiux is limited only by the particular physical
SUSY model postulated and constraints from re-
lated accelerator and astrophysical data (see e.g.,
some of the general discussion in [34]).

5

There is a distinct difference between the ex-
pected ceiestiai anguiar distributions of XX an-
nihilation 7-rays and X decay 7-rays . This dif-
ference can be used to observationally determine
whether multi-GeV 7-ray lines are from xX an-
nihilation or X decay. Whereas the annihilation
flux of dark matter halo 7-rays is proportional
to the line-of-sight integral of , ax decay flux
would be proportional only to the column den-
sity of X particles, i.e., the line-of-sight integral
of n^. Thus, decay photons would come from
dark matter decaying throughout the universe
and would have a much more isotropic distribu-
tion than that expected of annihilation photons.
The angular ditribution of annihilation photons
from an isothermal dark matter halo exhibits sig-
nificant anisotropy because of the factor {e.g.,
see Ref. [35].

5. CONCLUSION

Cosmic 7-rays and solar neutrinos produced by
SUSY dark matter particles are potentially ob-
servable with future telescopes of sufficient sen-
sitivity and energy resolution and with sophisti-
cated techniques for subtracting out events from
other sources involving other physical processes.
Such observations, in conjunction with accelera-
tor results, may enable us to finally determine the
nature of the dark matter.

REFERENCES

1. Q. Shafi and F.W. Stecker, Phys. Rev. Lett.
53 (1984) 1292.

2. R.K. Schaefer, Q. Shafi and F.W. Stecker, As-
trophys. J. 347

(1989) 575.

3. J. A. Holtzman, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 71
(1989) 1.

4. D.Yu. Pogosyan and A. A. Starobinsky, Mon.
Not. R. Astr. Soc. 265 (1993) 507; also Astro-
phys. J. 447 (1995) 465.

5. C.-P. Ma and E. Bertschinger, Astrophys. J.
434 (1994) L5.

6. A. Klypin, et ai, Astrophys. J. 444 (1995) 1.

7. A.R. Liddle, et ai, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc,
in press (1996).

8. A. Klypin, R. Nolthenius and J. Primack,
preprint (1996).

9. J. Primack, et ai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995)
2160.

10. K.S. Babu, R.K. Schaefer and Q. Shafi, Phys.
Rev. D53 (1996) 606.

11. J. Silk and M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53
(1984) 624.

12. F.W. Stecker, S. Rudaz and T.F. Walsh,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 2622.

13. S. Rudaz and F.W. Stecker, Astrophys. J. 325
(1988) 16.

14. F.W. Stecker and A.J. Tylka, Astrophys. J.
336 (1989) L51.

15. A.J. Tylka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 840.

16. J. Ellis, et ai, Nucl. Phys., B238 (1984) 453.

17. E. Diehl, et ai, Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 4223.

18. F.W. Stecker, Phys. Lett. B201 (1988) 529.

19. F.W. Stecker and A.J. Tylka, Astrophys. J.
343 (1989) 169.

20. T. SjSstrand, Comp. Phys. Comm. 39 (1986)
347

21. F.W. Stecker and M.H. Salamon, Astrophys.
J. 464 (1996) 600.

22. D.J. Thompson, et ai, Astrophys. J. Suppl.
101 (1995) 259.

23. M. Punch, et ai, Nature 358 (1992) 477.

24. J. Quinn, et ai Astrophys. J. 456 (1996) L83.

25. M.H. Salamon and F.W. Stecker (1996) in
preparation.

26. P. Sreekumar, et al. (1996) in preparation.

27. J.R. Ipser and P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. D35

(1987) 3695.

28. S. Rudaz, Phys. Rev. D39 (1989) 3549.

29. S. Rudaz and F.W. Stecker, Astrophys. J. 368
(1991) 406.

30. W. H. Press and D.N. Spergel, Astrophys. J.
296 (1985) 679.

31. J. Silk, K. Olive and M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 55 (1985) 257.

32. S. Ritz and D. Seckel, Nucl. Phys. B304

(1988) 877.

33. T.K. Gaisser, F. Halzen and T. Stanev, Phys.
Rpts. 258 (1995) 173.

34. V. Berezinsky, A. Masiero and J.W.F. Valle,
Phys. Lett. B 266 (1991) 382.

35. M. Turner, Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 1921.